Enhancement of Fish Stocks through Aquaculture Genetics

Title

Enhancement of Fish Stocks through Aquaculture Genetics

Authors

1. Michel Murwanashyaka, Kibogora polytechnic, Scientist, Rwanda
2. Lihua Jiang, Zhejiang Ocean University, Doctor, China
3. Xiaojun Yan, Zhejiang Ocean University, Professor, China

Abstract

The growing demand for fish globally underscores the necessity for advancements in aquaculture, where genetics plays a pivotal role. This study investigates how aquaculture genetics can enhance growth rates, disease resistance, and the productivity of key fish species. Genetic improvement programs, including genomic selection, marker-assisted selection, and selective breeding, are essential for accelerating these developments. By leveraging the genetic diversity present in fish populations, these programs aim to promote desirable traits, thereby enhancing the overall quality of fish stocks. Selective breeding, a cornerstore of genetic enhancement, has demonstrated significant potential in increasing growth rates and feed efficiency. Marker-assisted selection enhances this process by identifying specific genetic markers associated with beneficial traits, thus expediting the breeding cycle. At the forefront of these approaches is genomic selection, which utilizes genome-wide data to identify and select individuals with superior genetic potential, yielding unprecedented precision in breeding outcomes. Furthermore, genetic techniques are vital for improving disease resistance in aquaculture. By identifying and disseminating immunity-related alleles, the industry can mitigate the impacts of prevalent diseases, ensuring sustainable fish production. Advances in CRISPR-Cas9 and other gene-editing technologies may further accelerate the development of robust fish strains through targeted genetic modifications. These genetic strategies not only increase production but also promote sustainability by reducing the environmental impact of fish farming and reliance on wild fish populations. This research underscores the necessity of integrating cutting-edge genetic technologies with traditional breeding methods, positioning aquaculture genetics as the foundation for the future of sustainable fish farming.

Keywords

Aquaculture Genetics disease resistance genetic improvement genetic markers fish productivity

PDF

This browser does not support PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it: View the PDF.

Conclusion

The maintenance of sustainable practices and the satiation of burgeoning global demand for fish necessitate the pivotal role of aquaculture genetics in increasing fish populations. The advent of genetic principles has triggered a typical shift in aquaculture, facilitating the production of fish stocks with improved growth rates, disease resistance, and reproductive efficiency. The improvement of fish stocks' productivity and quality is largely dependent on aquaculture genetics. Scientists can create superior breeds of fish that grow quickly, resist sickness better, and reproduce more effectively by comprehending and modifying genetic features. This genetic advancement is essential to guaranteeing a consistent and dependable supply of fish that is fit for human consumption. Aquaculture's genetic advancement has been largely dependent on selective breeding initiatives. In these systems, the top performers are selected based on certain desired features, and they are then bred across multiple generations. By gradually enhancing these features in the population, this strategy improves overall performance, growth rates, and resilience to disease. Selective breeding has been transformed by the application of genetic markers and DNA analysis, which allows for more accurate breeding stock selection. With the aid of these instruments, it is possible to identify particular genes linked to desired characteristics, making it easier to choose people who possess these genes. Breeding programs are more accurate, and the breeding process moves more quickly thanks to this genomic information. Techniques like hybridization and cross-breeding are used to combine advantageous features from various strains or species. Aquaculturists can generate fish with improved traits, like faster growth and increased resilience to environmental stressors, by breeding hybrids. The genetic variety and adaptability of aquaculture organisms are increased by these techniques. Advancements in genome editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9, present previously unheard-of possibilities to directly alter fish genetic composition. Compared to conventional breeding approaches, these technologies are more accurate and effective at producing fish with specified features because they can add, remove, or modify specific genes. Aquaculture could benefit greatly from focused and quick genetic advancements thanks to gene editing. Whole-genome data is used by genomic selection to forecast an individual's breeding value. By using the complete genetic data, this method chooses the most suitable candidates for reproduction, increasing the precision and effectiveness of genetic enhancement initiatives. Genomic selection works especially well for complex traits with multiple gene influences.

The production of fish has been greatly affected by the incorporation of these genetic approaches. Higher yields and faster production cycles are made possible by improved growth rates. Better disease resistance results in healthier stocks by lowering death rates and the requirement for medical interventions. A steady supply of fry and fingerlings is ensured by increased reproductive performance, which supports viable aquaculture operations. In the future, maintaining genetic improvement while taking ethical and ecological factors into account would require sustainable genetic management. To avoid inbreeding and guarantee the long-term sustainability of fish stocks, genetic diversity must be preserved. It is important to carefully analyse the ethical implications of gene editing and any potential ecological effects. For aquaculture to remain sustainable in the future, integrating genomic technology into standard operating procedures will necessitate large infrastructural and training investments.

Reference

1. Ajmone M. P, B. P., Licia C, Johanes A.L, . (2023). Genomic characterization of animal genetic resources - Practical guide. Reasearchgate. doi:https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3079en Ansai, S., Kinoshita, M. . (2014). Targeted mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas system in medaka. . Biology Open, 3(5), 362–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20148177 Bartley D, R. K., Immink A . . (2001). The use of inter-specific hybrids in aquaculture and fisheries. Review in Fish Biology. Bentsen, H. B., Gjerde, B., Nguyen, N.H., Rye, M., Ponzoni, R.W., Palada de Vera, M.S., Bolivar, H.L., Velasco, R.R., Danting, J.C., Dionisio, E.E., Longalong, F.M., Reyes, R.A., Abella, T.A., Tayamen, M.M., Eknath, A.E., . (2012). Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias: Genetic parameters for body weight at harvest in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) during five generations of testing in multiple environments. . Aquaculture, 338–341, 356–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.01.027 Boudry, P., Allal, F., Aslam, M. L., Bargelloni, L., Bean, T. P., Brard-Fudulea, S., . . . Houston, R. D. (2021). Current status and potential of genomic selection to improve selective breeding in the main aquaculture species of International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) member countries. Aquaculture Reports, 20, 100700. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100700 Brummett, R. E. a. M. J. W. ( 2000). The evolution of aquaculture in African rural and economic development. Ecological Economics, 33, 193–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00142-1 Campos-Montes G. R., M. H. H., Martínez-Ortega A., Jiménez A. M., Castillo-Juárez H. . (2013). Genetic parameters for growth and survival traits in Pacific white shrimp Penaeus (Litopenaeus vannamei) from a nucleus population undergoing a two-stage selection program. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9553-1 Chen, C.-C., Huang, C.-W., Lin, C.-Y., Ho, C.-H., Pham, H. N., Hsu, T.-H., . . . Gong, H.-Y. (2022). Development of Disease-Resistance-Associated Microsatellite DNA Markers for Selective Breeding of Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) Farmed in Taiwan. Genes, 13(1), 99. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010099 Dunham, R. A. (2011). Aquaculture and fisheries biotechnology: genetic approaches. 2nd Edition. Aquaculture and Fisheries Biotechnology: , pp 240–277. Dunham, R. A. M., M.P, . (2012). Production of Hybrid Catfish. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center: Stoneville, MS, USA, 436, 1–7. Dupont-Nivet M., V. M., Haffray P., Chevassus B. . (2006). Effect of different mating designs on inbreeding, genetic variance and response to selection when applying individual selection in fish breeding programs. Aquaculture. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.07.005 Eknath, A., Dey, M., Rye, M., Gjerde, B., Abella, T. A., Sevilleja, R., . . . Bentsen, H. (1998). Selective Breeding of Nile Tilapia for Asia. 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 27, 89–96. Eknath, A. E., et al. . (2007). Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias: the growth performance of eight strains of Oreochromis niloticus tested in different farm environments. Aquaculture, 228(1-4), 105–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(93)90035-W El-Sayed, A.-F. (2019). Tilapia Culture. 2nd ed. . Elsevier/Academic, 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816509-6.00001-X Elaswad A, D. R. (2018). Disease reduction in aquaculture with genetic and genomic technology: current and future aproaches. Rev Aquacul, 10(4), 876– 898. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12205 Evans, B., Bartlett, J., Sweijd, N., Cook, P., & Elliott, N. G. (2004). Loss of genetic variation at microsatellite loci in hatchery produced abalone in Australia (Haliotis rubra) and South Africa (Haliotis midae). Aquaculture, 233(1), 109–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.09.037 FAO. (2016). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. , Rome, 2016. FAO. (2022). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture Towards Blue Transformation. Rome. FAO. (2022). Global plan of action for the conservation, sustainable use and development of aquatic genetic resources for food and agriculture. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Fernandes Junior, G. A. (2016). Genomic prediction of breeding values for carcass traits in Nellore cattle. Genetics, selection,. Genomic Selection and Evolution, 48, p.7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0188-y Fraslin, C., Houston, R. D., & Robledo, D. (2022). Chapter 6 - Methods for mapping genomic variants associated with production traits in aquaculture species. In I. F. Monzón & J. M. O. Fernandes (Eds.), Cellular and Molecular Approaches in Fish Biology (pp. 193–220): Academic Press. Gjedrem, T. (2000 ). Genetic improvement of cold-water fish species. . Aquaculture Research, 31(1), 25–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.00389.x Gjedrem, T. ( 2010). The First Family-Based Breeding Program in Aquaculture. . Reviews in Aquaculture. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2010.01011.x Gjedrem, T., & Baranski, M. ( 2009). Selective Breeding in Aquaculture: An Introduction. . Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2773-3 Gjedrem, T., Robinson, N., and Rye, M. . (2012). The importance of selective breeding in aquaculture to meet future demands for animal protein: A review. Aquaculture. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.008 Gjøen, H. M., & Bentsen, H. B. . (1997). Past, present, and future of genetic improvement in salmon aquaculture. . ICES Journal of Marine Science, , 54(6), 1009–1014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-3139(97)80005-7 Glover, K. A., Otterå, H., Olsen, R. E., Slinde, E., Taranger, G. L., & Skaala, Ø. (2009). A comparison of farmed, wild and hybrid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) reared under farming conditions. Aquaculture, 286(3), 203–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.09.023 Gotesman, M., Menanteau-Ledouble, S., Saleh, M., Bergmann, S. M., & El-Matbouli, M. (2018). A new age in AquaMedicine: unconventional approach in studying aquatic diseases. BMC Veterinary Research, 14(1), 178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1501-5 Grunwald, D. J., Eisen, J. S. . (2002). Headwaters of the zebrafish—emergence of a new model vertebrate. . Nature Reviews Genetics, 3(9) 717–724. Gupta, M. V., & Acosta, B. O. . (2004). From drawing board to dining table: The success story of the GIFT project. . NAGA, WorldFish Center Quarterly, 27(3-4), 4–14. Habier, D., R. L. Fernando, K. Kizilkaya, and D. Garrick. . (2011). Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. . BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-186 Hatanaka, T. a. G., Jr P.M. . (2003). RAPD markers indicate the occurrence of structured populations in a migratory freshwater fish species. . Genetics and Molecular Biology 26, 19–25. Henriksson, P. J. G., Troell, M., Banks, L. K., Belton, B., Beveridge, M. C. M., Klinger, D. H., . . . Tran, N. (2021). Interventions for improving the productivity and environmental performance of global aquaculture for future food security. One Earth, 4(9), 1220–1232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.009 Herkenhoff, M. E. (2025). Perspectives of Population Genetics in the Genetic Improvement and Biodiversity Conservation of Fish Species. In R. T. Maia, P. T. Felix, & M. D. A. Campos (Eds.), Advances and Trends in Population Genetics Studies. London: IntechOpen. Houston, R. D., Davey, J. W., Bishop, S. C., Lowe, N. R., Mota-Velasco, J. C., Hamilton, A., . . . Taggart, J. B. (2012). Characterisation of QTL-linked and genome-wide restriction site-associated DNA (RAD) markers in farmed Atlantic salmon. BMC Genomics, 13, 244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-244 Houston, R. D., & Macqueen, D. J. (2019). Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) genetics in the 21st century: taking leaps forward in aquaculture and biological understanding. Anim Genet, 50(1), 3–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12748 Houston, R. D. e. a. (2020 ). Harnessing genomics to fast-track genetic improvement in 668 aquaculture. . Nature Reviews Genetics. Nature Research, pp. 389–409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576- 669 020-0227-y. Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S., & Zhang, F. . (2014). Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell, 157(6), 1262–1278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 Huntingford, F. A. A., C. E. . (2005). Behavioural syndromes in farmed fish: implications for production welfare. . Behaviour, 142, 1207–1221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/156853905774539382 Hussain, M. G. a. A. H. M. K. (2003 ). Breeding, monosex male tilapia seed production and culture technologies of BFRI super tilapia. . Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Mymensingh, Extension manual No. 25. Janssen, K., Berentsen, P., & Komen, J. (2015). Current status of selective breeding in European aquaculture. Kang et al. ( 2009). Introducing precise genetic modifications by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. J Assist Reprod Genet. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0710-8 Kapuscinski, A. R., and D.J. Brister. (2001). Genetic Impacts of Aquaculture. Environ mental Effects of Aquaculture. Kapuscinski, A. R. H., E.M. . (1991). Implications of introduction of transgenic fish into natural ecosystems. . Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 48 (suppl. 1), 99–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/f91-308 Kashyap, N., Meher, P., Eswaran, S., Kathirvelpandian, A., Udit, U., Jaiswar, R., . . . Kashyap. (2024). A Review on Genetic Improvement in Aquaculture through Selective Breeding. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology, 27, 618–631. doi:https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i71022 Lal, J., Vaishnav, A., Singh, S. K., Meena, D. K., Biswas, P., Mehta, N. K., & Priyadarshini, M. B. (2024). Biotechnological innovation in fish breeding: from marker assisted selection to genetic modification. Discover Biotechnology, 1(1), 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s44340-024-00007-6 Li L, L. Y., Huang T, Liang W, Chen M. . (2019). Development of an attenuated oral vaccine strain of tilapia group B streptococci serotype Iay gene knockout technology. . Fish Shellfish Immunol. , 93, 924– 933. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.07.081 Li, Q., Xu, K., & Yu, R. (2007). Genetic variation in Chinese hatchery populations of the Japanese scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) inferred from microsatellite data. Aquaculture, 269(1), 211–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.04.017 Lien, S., Koop, B. F., Sandve, S. R., Miller, J. R., Kent, M. P., Nome, T., . . . Davidson, W. S. (2016). The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature, 533(7602), 200–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17164 Liu, W., Chen, L., Zhang, S., Hu, F., Wang, Z., Lyu, J., et al. . (2019). Decrease of gene expression diversity during domestication of animals and plants. BMC Evol. Biol. , 19, 19. . doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018- 1340-9 Lorenzen, K., M. C. Beveridge, and M. Mangel. . (2012). Cultured fish: integrative biology and management of domestication and interactions with wild fish. Biological Reviews, 87, 639–660. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00215.x Marris, C. (2001). Public perceptions of transgenic products: the influence of the behaviour of laboratory scientists. In J.-P. Toutant and E. Balàzs (Eds.) Molecular Farming : Proceedings of the OECD Workshop held in La Grande Motte (France) September 3-6, 2000., INRA editions, Versailles. , pp.289–305. Meuwissen TH, H. B., Goddard ME (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 Muir, W. M. a. R. D. H., . . ( 2002a). Assessment of possible ecological risks and hazards of transgenic fish with implications for other sexually reproducing organisms. Transgenic Res, pp. 355–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015203812200. Naylor, R. L., Hardy, R. W., Buschmann, A. H., Bush, S. R., Cao, L., Klinger, D. H., . . . Troell, M. (2021). A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature, 591(7851), 551–563. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6 Ponzoni, R., Nguyen, N., Khaw, H. L., Hamzah, A., Abu-Bakar, K., & Yee, H. Y. (2011). Genetic improvement of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) with special reference to the work conducted by the WorldFish Center with the GIFT strain. Reviews in Aquaculture, 3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2010.01041.x Shakweer, W. M. E., Krivoruchko, A. Y., Dessouki, S. M., & Khattab, A. A. (2023). A review of transgenic animal techniques and their applications. J Genet Eng Biotechnol, 21(1), 55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-023-00502-z Shoemaker, C. A., Klesius, P. H., & Evans, J. J. . (2006 ). Modified live Flavobacterium columnare vaccine: field safety and efficacy in tilapia. Aquaculture, 261(2), 752–758. Silverstein J. T, V. R. L., Palti Y, Leeds T. D, Rexroad C, E. III Welch, T. J, Wiens G, D. Ducrocq V. . (2008). Rainbow trout resistance to bacterial cold-water disease in moderately heritable and is not adversely correlated with growth. Animal Science. doi:https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1157 Sonesson, A., Hallerman, E., Humphries, F., Hilsdorf, A., Leskien, D., Rosendal, G. K., . . . Mair, G. (2023). Sustainable management and improvement of genetic resources for aquaculture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 54, 364–396. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12968 Sonesson AK, G. B., Meuwissen (2005). Truncation selection for BLUP-EBV and phenotypic values in fish breeding schemes. Aquaculture. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.09.024 Thodesen, J., et al., . (1999 ). Genetic variation in feed intake, growth and feed utilization in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture, 180(3-4), 237–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00527-5 Van Eenennaam & Muir. (2011). Transgenic salmon: a final leap to the glocery shelf. Nature Biotechnology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1938 Van Eenennaam, A. L. (2017). Genetic modification of food animals. . Curr.Opin. Biotechnol, 44, 27–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.10.007 Vandeputte, M. (2003). Selective breeding of quantitative traits in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio): a review. Aquatic Living Resources, 16(5), 399–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0990-7440(03)00056-1 Vandeputte M., G. R., Dupont-Nivet M., Haffray P., Vergnet A., Chavanne H., et al. . (2014). Multi-site evaluation of the rearing performances of 5 wild populations of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). . Aquaculture. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.01.005 VanRaden, P. M. (2008). Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. . J. Dairy Sci, 91, 4414–4423. doi:https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0980. VanRaden, P. M., Tooker, M. E., O'Connell, J. R., Cole, J. B., & Bickhart, D. M. (2017). Selecting sequence variants to improve genomic predictions for dairy cattle. Genet Sel Evol, 49(1), 32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-017-0307-4 Williamson, J. H. (2001). Broodstock management for imperilled and other fishes. In: Fish hatchery management, (Ed. G. A. Wedemeyer),. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, second edition, 397–482. Xu, K., Duan, W., Xiao, J., Tao, M., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., & Liu, S. (2015). Development and application of biological technologies in fish genetic breeding. Science China Life Sciences, 58(2), 187–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-015-4798-3 Yáñez, J. M., Houston, R. D., & Newman, S. (2014). Genetics and genomics of disease resistance in salmonid species. Frontiers in Genetics, Volume 5 - 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00415 Yáñez, J. M., Houston, R. D., and Newman, S. . (2014). Genetics and genomics of disease resistance in salmonid species. . Front Genetics. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00415. Ye, D., Zhu, Z., & Sun, Y. (2015). Fish genome manipulation and directional breeding. Sci China Life Sci, 58(2), 170–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-015-4806-7 Youngson, N. A., & Whitelaw, E. (2008). Transgenerational epigenetic effects. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 9, 233–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164445 Yu, Z., Mingxing, H. A. N., Mingyue, C. A. O., Yayun, Z., Juan, L. I., & Liangyi, X. U. E. (2018). SNP Detection of <em>FST</em> Gene and Its Association With Growth Traits in <em>Larimichthys crocea</em>. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 32(5), 883–891. doi:https://doi.org/10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.05.0883 Yue, G. H., Zhu, Z. Y., Lo, L. C., Wang, C. M., Lin, G., Feng, F., . . . Orban, L. (2009). Genetic variation and population structure of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) in the Asia-Pacific region. Aquaculture, 293(1), 22–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.03.053 Zaid, A. H., H.G. Porceddu, E. and Nicholas, F. . (1999). Glossary of biotechnology and genetic engineering. FAO Research and Technology Paper. No. 7, Rome, Italy. Zhang, Y., Ding, Y., Guo, F., & Wang, X. . (2020). Application of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in aquaculture species: advancements and prospects. . Molecular Science. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179299 Zhang, Z., Lu, C., Lin, K., You, W., & Yang, Z. (2023). Genetic Diversity and Genetic Structure among Four Selected Strains of Whiteleg Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Using SSR Markers. Fishes, 8(11), 544. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8110544 Zhou, H., Xiao, X., Asjad, A., Han, D., Zheng, W., Xiao, G., . . . Zhou, Q. (2022). Integration of GWAS and transcriptome analyses to identify SNPs and candidate genes for aluminum tolerance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). BMC Plant Biol, 22(1), 130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03508-w Zhu, B., & Ge, W. (2018). Genome editing in fishes and their applications. Gen Comp Endocrinol, 257, 3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2017.09.011

Author Contribution

Murwanashyaka Michel: Writing original draft, writing review & editing. Lihua Jiang: Supervision, writing review & editing. Xiaojun Yan: Supervision, funding acquisition.

Funding

This work is supported by the Aquaculture Breeding and Seedling Technology Innovation Center Project of Zhoushan (2025Y001-1), National Key Research and Development Program of China Grants (2023YFD2401900), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFD2401905)

Software Information

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest in the paper

Acknowledge

This is to thank Kibogora Polytechnic University, Department of Sciences, PO. BOX 50 Nyamasheke, Rwanda, with its partnership with the National Engineering Research Center of Marine Facilities Aquaculture, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan, 316022, China.

Data availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.