Enhancing Transplant Outcomes with AI-Driven Immunologic Risk Analysis
1. Cris Tismo, U.P. College of Medicine and Surgery, Student, Indonesia
2. Chezca punto, U.P. College of Medicine and Surgery, Lecturer, Indonesia
Despite the fact that immunologic rejection offers a considerable danger to long-term graft survival, organ transplantation continues to be a treatment that may save the lives of patients who are going through the latter stages of organ failure. Traditional techniques of immunologic risk assessment, such as matching with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and testing with panel-reactive antibody (PRA), have limitations when it comes to predicting transplant rejection. A revolution in healthcare has occurred as a result of developments in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), which have made it possible to do predictive analytics, tailor medical treatment, and enhance risk stratification. Artificial intelligence-driven models include data from several omics, deep learning algorithms, and predictive modelling in order to give physicians with accurate and timely insights that can be used for decision-making. Artificial intelligence-driven systems have the potential to revolutionise transplant medicine by refining immunosuppressive medication and increasing patient outcomes. This is despite the fact that there are hurdles such as data bias, interpretability, and regulatory issues.
Immunologic Risk Analysis Organ Transplantation Graft Rejection Predictive Analytics Personalized Medicine HLA Matching AI in Healthcare
Improved risk stratification, rejection prediction, and optimisation of customised immunosuppressive medication are just a few ways in which AI-driven immunologic risk analysis is changing the face of transplant medicine. Transplant outcomes may be improved by the use of deep learning and machine learning models that include genetic, clinical, and histopathological data. Early rejection diagnosis is made possible using AI-driven predictive analytics, which in turn reduces transplant failure. Data bias, model interpretability, and regulatory impediments are some of the problems that need to be overcome before broad adoption may occur. Clinical decision-making and trust may both be enhanced by explainable AI (XAI). Data quality may be improved using federated learning technologies while patient privacy is preserved. For successful deployment, it is essential that AI developers and transplant experts collaborate. Clinical integration will be accelerated with the standardisation of AI models and regulatory clearances. The goal of future studies should be to make AI models more suitable for practical use. In the long run, artificial intelligence might greatly enhance transplant results and patient survival rates.
1. -
The study's design, data collection, result analysis, and manuscript preparation were entirely managed by the author.
No specific funding was provided by any public, commercial, or non-profit sectors for this study.
The research did not involve the use of any particular software or tools.
The authors disclose no conflicts of interest in relation to this work.
Thanks to all who provided assistance and expertise for this research and manuscript, and to the peer reviewers for their constructive feedback.
This article does not involve the sharing of data.