CEO succession has always been a critical juncture for organizations. However, these transitions become even more precarious during political realignments and rapid executive turnover. This paper explores how CEO succession, shaped by the shifting ideological landscape and frequent leadership changes, can either stabilize or destabilize organizations. Using a multi-disciplinary approach, this study investigates how political ideologies influence corporate governance, executive leadership strategies, and succession planning, with a focus on how companies adapt to such turbulence while maintaining corporate continuity.
Data sharing is not part of this study.
All authors declare the absence of any conflicts of interest.
All study-related tasks, from conception and design to data analysis and manuscript creation, were solely managed by the author.
This study did not receive specific financial support from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.
No specific software or tools were used in the research.
I appreciate the assistance and expertise provided by everyone involved in this research and manuscript, and the valuable comments from peer reviewers.
-